首页题目详情

Nokia executives attempted to explain its fall from the top of the smartphone pyramid with three factors: 1) that Nokia was technically inferior to Apple, 2) that the company was complacent and 3) that its leaders didn't see the disruptive iPhone coming.
It has also been argued that it was none of the above. Nokia lost the smartphone battle because of divergent shared fears among the company's middle and top managers which led to company-wide inertia that left it powerless to respond to Apple's game.
Based on the findings of an in-depth investigation and 76 interviews with top and middle managers, engineers, and external experts, the researchers discovered a culture of fear due to temperamental leaders and that frightened middle managers were scared of telling the truth.
The fear that froze the company came from two places. First, the company's top managers had a terrifying reputation. Some members of Nokia's board and top management were described as “extremely temperamental” and they regularly shouted at people “at the top of their lungs”. It was very difficult to tell them things they didn't want to hear. Secondly, top managers were afraid of the external environment and not meeting their quarterly targets, which also impacted how they treated middle managers.
Top managers thus made middle managers afraid of disappointing them. Middle managers were told that they were not ambitious enough to meet top managers’ goals.
Fearing the reactions of top managers, middle managers remained silent or provided optimistic, filtered information. Thus, middle managers directly lied to top management.
Worse, a culture of status inside Nokia made everyone want to hold onto vested power for fear of resources being allocated elsewhere if they delivered bad news or showed that they were not bold or ambitious enough to undertake challenging assignments.
Beyond verbal pressure, top managers also applied pressure for faster performance in personnel selection. This led middle managers to over promise and under deliver. One middle manager told us that “you can get resources by promising something earlier or promising a lot. It's sales work.”
While modest fear might be healthy for motivation, abusing it can be like overusing a drug, which risks generating harmful side effects. To reduce this risk, leaders should coordinate with the varied emotions of the staff. Nokia's top managers should have encouraged safe dialogue, internal coordination, and feedback to understand the true emotion in the organization.

1. Nokia lost the smartphone battle because its technology is not as good as that of Apple. (1)

2. Nokia's middle managers were frank to tell the truth, but the top ones didn't listen to them. (2)

3. Nokia's top managers were too moody to hear anything unpleasant. (3)

4. Middle managers in Nokia delivered results more than they promised earlier. (4)

5. Nokia's top managers should have had better conversation techniques to encourage internal coordination and truth. (5)

完型填空
2023-05-23 18:00:21
0192
  (1) cloze Subject
     A. T
     B. F
  (2) cloze Subject
     A. T
     B. F
  (3) cloze Subject
     A. T
     B. F
  (4) cloze Subject
     A. T
     B. F
  (5) cloze Subject
     A. T
     B. F
参考答案:……
查看答案
 参考答案
课程:管理英语4
学科:未分类
感兴趣题目
cloze Subject
cloze Subject
cloze Subject
cloze Subject
cloze Subject
It's important for a CEO to be passionate and enthusiastic, but there's a line of professionalism that must always be maintained. According to a report from the technology website Venture Beat, PayPal CEO David Marcus wrote a critical letter to his employees blaming them for not using PayPal products and encouraging them to leave if they didn't have the passion to use the products they work for. According to the website, part of the leaked letter reads: “It's been brought to my attention that when testing paying with mobile at Cafe 17 last week, some of you refused to install the PayPal app, and others didn't even remember their PayPal passwords. That's unacceptable to me, and the rest of my team, everyone at PayPal should use our products where available. That's the only way we can make them better, and better.” “In closing, if you are one of the folks who refused to install the PayPal app or if you can't remember your PayPal password, do yourself a favor, go and find something that will connect with your heart and mind elsewhere.” While not obvious at first, the letter reveals a problem of morale and culture at PayPal. As an executive, you certainly want your employees to use and promote your products. However, when faced with a situation where staff isn't embracing what they make, you need to investigate the root of the problem -- not threaten. When faced with internal problems, good executives start by asking “why”. They reach out to their executive team first and then to the entire staff to find the root of a problem and how to fix it. Sending out a one-sided note about the problem is not leading, it's retreating. Leadership starts by listening. Good executives need to get out among the staff and ask questions and listen without judgment or reaction. The fact that company employees are not embracing and using its products is a failure of leadership that Marcus needs to address by self-reflection. At the end of the day, if his employees have to be forced to use the app, how can he expect consumers to want to willingly pay to use it? Marcus should have focused on three questions: • Why are you not using the app? • What is it that we can do to ensure you use our app? • What do you need from me?1. A CEO only needs to be passionate and enthusiastic. (1) 2. It is not professional that PayPal CEO blames his employees for not using PayPal or forgetting PayPal passwords. (2) 3. “A one-sided note” refers to the root of PayPal's problem. (3) 4. When faced with internal problems, good executives find the root of a problem in their executive team first. (4) 5. Good executives need to give feedback immediately when they are listening to the staff. (5)
cloze Subject
cloze Subject
cloze Subject
cloze Subject
cloze Subject
When you think of team building, do you immediately picture your group off at a resort playing games or hanging from ropes? Traditionally, many organizations approach team building in this way but, then, they wonder why that wonderful sense of teamwork that had been displayed at the retreat or the seminar fails to impact long term beliefs and actions back at work. I'm not averse to retreats, planning sessions, seminars, and team building activities – in fact I lead them – but they have to form part of a much larger teamwork effort. You will not build teamwork by “retreating” as a group for a couple of days each year, instead you need to think of team building as something you do every single day. • Form teams to solve real work issues and to improve real work processes. Provide training in systematic methods so the team expends its energy on the project, not on trying to work out how to work together as a team to approach the problem. • Hold department meetings to review projects and progress, to obtain broad input, and to coordinate shared work processes. If there is friction between team members, examine the work processes they mutually own – the problem is not usually their personalities; instead, it is often the fact that the team members haven't agreed on how they will deliver a product or service, or the steps required to get something done. • Build fun and shared occasions into the organization's agenda – hold pot luck lunches, take the team to a sporting event, sponsor dinners at a local restaurant, go hiking, or go to an amusement park. Hold a monthly company meeting, sponsor sports teams and encourage cheering team fans. • Use ice breakers and teamwork exercises at meetings – these help team members get to know each other, share details about each other's lives, and have a laugh together. • Celebrate team successes publicly. There are many ways you could do this, for instance by buying everyone the same t-shirt or hat, putting team member names in a draw for company merchandise, and gift certificates. The only thing limiting you is your imagination. If you do the types of teamwork building listed above, you'll be amazed at the progress you will make in creating a teamwork culture, a culture that enables individuals to contribute more than they ever thought possible – together.1. Team building event is traditionally related to playing games at the resort. (1) 2. The author claims that playing games together is as important as forming teams to solve real work issues and improve real work processes for team building. (2) 3. “Retreat” in the first paragraph means withdrawal of troops after a defeat. (3) 4. Ice breaking motivates team members to compete with each other. (4) 5. A good teamwork culture enables individuals to make more efforts together. (5)
相关题目
练习1(多选):政府利益的表现形式( )。
美国政治学家P·狄辛将人类社会追求的五种理性作为政策评估的标准:技术理性、经济理性、政治理性、法律理性和社会理性。(   )
查尔斯·琼斯指出在政策执行的诸多行为活动中,以(   )三者最为重要。
政策规划的基本精髓就在于(  )。
练习(单选):( )的建立是社会问题转化为政策问题的关键一步。
练习3(判断):政策问题的论证可以分为一级论证、二级论证、多级论证和小论证。( )
按照地域原则划分,一个国家的政策环境可简单划分为国内政策环境和国内政治法律环境。(    )
社会问题的新特点不包括(     )
影响政策目标群体态度取向的因素主要有(    )。
练习1(单选):根据受“问题”影响人数的多少及其关系将社会问题分为分配性问题、调节性问题和再分配问题的是美国公共政策学家( )
公共政策主体体系包括(     )。
练习1(单选):由专业人员组成的跨学科、跨领域的综合性政策研究组织被称为( )。
练习1(单选):( )是公共政策主体的核心力量。
练习1(判断):公共政策科学在西方经历了创建、形成、自我批判反思和拓展新的研究方向等几个阶段。( )
荷兰经济学家(    )是最早试图对政策工具加以分类的学者。
这里可作为广告区域
无忧题库

微信扫码关注 无忧题库 公众号